For the delta deviance influence diagnostic in logistic regression, it seems that Stata uses formula #5.26 in Hosmer, et.al. (2013). 5.26 is stated to be an "approximation" if the subject's Pearson residual is substituted for the deviance residual from the prior formula. However, Minitab uses the formula without this substitution (just prior, but unnumbered in the text). These formulas produce somewhat different values, and I am trying to understand the logic of Stata on this choice.
Thanks